Alternative Dispute Resolution Approaches and their Application

From WaterWiki.net

Jump to: navigation, search
edit  ·  ToolkitWater Conflict and Cooperation
History of Humanity and Water | Shared Waters and Ethics | Legal and Institutional Approaches | Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
Emerging Trends | Public Participation | Indicators | Means and Tools | Basin Management | Lessons Learned
Organisations and Projects | Publications | Glossary | Bibliography
Case Studies: Incomati | Nile | Columbia | Lempa | Lake Titicaca | Mekong | Aral Sea | Rhine | Jordan I | Jordan II
Events | Contacts

Publication Title

Alternative Dispute Resolution Approaches and their Application

Publication Type

UNESCO-IHP Publication, PCCP Series, 43 p.

Author(s)

Yona Shamir

Publication Date

2003

ISBN-ISSN-EAN

Publication URL

Contact

Contents

Summary

Alternative Dispute Resolution comprises various approaches for resolving disputes in a non-confrontational way, ranging from negotiation between the two parties, a multi-party negotiation, through mediation, consensus building, to arbitration and adjudication.

The report introduces the key skills required, with particular attention to their important role in the process of negotiation and mediation, with examples of their application in national and international water conflicts.

Conflict is endemic to human society, among individuals and groups, and it is important to manage it. We find stories in the Bible, in the Islamic culture, among Native Americans, First Nations in Canada, and many other traditions that describe processes that have been used from the earliest times to find peaceful solutions to various disputes, and much can be learned from the past.

In recent decades, the various conflict resolution approaches have become a widely accepted field both of academic study and of practice, with official and/or legislative functions in many countries. In international relations, they plays an increasing role in containing, managing and resolving potential sources of conflict.

The report reviews its complex development. While conflict can be dangerous, it also carries the possibility of producing creative cooperation in a win.win solution. The key to this is for participants to engage as joint problem solvers, seeking to resolve the dispute, and to try and "enlarge the pie" rather than acting as adversaries and aggravating the situation.

A mediator can play a valuable role in this process, facilitate a negotiation process which has come to a dead end, helping the parties concerned to focus on their essential interests rather than defend (or attack) fixed positions. The principles and procedures of consensus building are dealt with in some detail.

The report outlines the principles of negotiation, based on interests and needs of the parties, the use of proper communication, and maintenance of a working relationship as an essential component for reaching a durable agreement.

It lists and considers the essential skills needed by negotiators and mediators, and points the different cultural expectations (national, regional, religious, or professional) and the psychological aspects that affect perceptions and communications. It outlines a range of strategies for and approaches to mediation, and the ethical problems that may arise.

Content

References

  • Acland, A. F. 1990. Managing Conflict Through Mediation. London, Hutchinson Business.
  • ––––. 1995. Resolving Disputes Without Going To Court: A Consumer Guide to Alternative Dispute Resolution. London, Random House. Aitken, R.; Brand, M.; Allooloo, T.; McCready, K.; and Grant, J. 1993. Building Consensus for A Sustainable Future: Guiding Principles. Canada, Round tables on Environment.
  • Arrow, K.; Mnookin, R. H.; Ross, L.; Tversky, A.; and Wilson, R. 1995. Barriers To Conflict Resolution. London, W. W. Norton.
  • Bazerman, M. 1983. Negotiator Judgment: A Critical Look at the Rationality Assumption. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 27, No. 2.
  • ––––. 1986. Why Negotiations Go Wrong. Psychology Today, March
  • Bazerman, M. and Neale, M. 1993. Negotiating Rationally. New York, Free Press.
  • Bercovitch, J. 1984. Problems and Approaches in The Study of Bargaining and Negotiation. Political Science. Boulder, Colo.
  • ––––. 1984. Social Conflict and Third Parties. Westview Press.
  • Bercovitch, J. and Rubin, J. 1992. Mediation in International Relations. London, Macmillan.
  • Berton, P.; Hiroshi, K.; and Zartman, B. 1999. Justice, Fairness, and Negotiation: Theory and Reality. New York, St. Martin’s.
  • Berton, P.; Kimura, H.; and Zartman, W. 1999. International Negotiation, Actors, Structure/Process, Values. New York, St. Martin’s.
  • Birk, R. and Fox, C. 1999. Psychological Principles in Negotiating Civil Settlements. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Spring.
  • Breslin, W. and Rubin, J. 1991. Negotiation Theory and Practice. Harvard University, PON.
  • Brett, J. M. et. al., 1998. Culture and Joint Gains in Negotiation. Negotiation Journal, Vol. 14.
  • Burgess, G. and Burgess, H. 1994. Environmental Mediation: Beyond the Limits Applying Dispute Resolution Principles to Intractable Environmental Conflicts. Working Paper. www.colorado.edu/conflict/tul_text_research/
  • Cohen, R. 1991. Negotiating Across Cultures: Communication Obstacles in International Diplomacy. Washington, D.C., United States Institute of Peace.
  • Cohen, R. 1996. Negotiating Across Cultures. In: Chester, Crocker and Hampson, Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict, Washington, D.C., United States Institute of Peace.
  • Deutsch, M. 1973. The Resolution of Conflict. Newhaven, Conn., Yale University Press.
  • Deutsch, M. and Coleman, P. (eds) 2000. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • Dukes, F. 1993. Public Conflict Resolution–Administrative Approach. Negotiation Journal, January.
  • Ehrlich, A.; Gleick, P.; and Conca, K. 2000. Resources and Environmental Degradation as Sources of Conflict. Pugwash Conference, August 2000, http://www.ciaonet.org
  • Faure, G. 1999. Cultural Aspects of International Negotiation. In: P. Berton, H. Kimura, and I. W. Zartman, International Negotiation: Actors, Structure/Process, Values. New York, St. Martin’s.
  • Faure, G. and Rubin, J. 1993. Culture and Negotiation. London, Sage.
  • Fisher, R. 1964. International Conflict and Behavioral Sciences. New York, Basic Books.
  • Fisher, R. and Brown, S. 1988. Getting Together. Boston, Mass., Houghton Mifflin.
  • Fisher, R.; Ury, W.; and Patton, B. 1991. Getting to Yes. London, Penguin.
  • Folberg, J. and Taylor, A. 1984. Mediation: A Comprehensive Guide to Resolving Conflict Without Litigation. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • Folger, J. and Bush, R. 1994. The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass
  • ––––. 1996. Transformative Mediation and Third-Party Intervention: Ten Hallmarks of a Transformative Approach to Practice. Mediation Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 4.
  • Fox, E. and Urwick, L. 1973. Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. London, Pitman.
  • Frederick, K. 1996. Water as a Source of International Conflict. Resources for the Future, Spring.
  • Gold, L. 1993. Influencing Unconscious Influences: The Healing Dimension of Mediation. Mediation Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 1.
  • Goldberg, S. B.; Sander, F. E. A.; and Rogers, N. H. 1992. Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation, and other Processes. Boston, Mass., Little Brown.
  • ––––. 1995. Dispute Resolution: Negotiation, Mediation, and other Processes: 1995 Supplement. Boston, Toronto, London, Aspen.
  • Gulliver, P. H. 1979. Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Academic Press.
  • Haftendorn, H. 1999. Water and International Conflict. Conference Proceedings, CIAO, Feb.1999, http://www.ciaonet.org
  • Hall, E. 1976. Beyond Culture. New York, Doubleday.
  • Hamer, J. and Wolf, A. 1997. Patterns in International Water Resources Treaties: The Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 1997 Yearbook.
  • Hampson, F. and Hart, M. 1995. Multilateral Negotiations: Lessons From Arms Control, Trade, and the Environment. Baltimore, Md., Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hampson, F. and Reppy, J. 1996. Earthly Goods: Environmental Change and Social Justice. New York, Cornell University Press.
  • Hoffman, D. 1997. Tools of the Trade: A Manual for the Settlement-Oriented Mediator. Harvard Law Review, Spring.
  • Hopmann, P. 1995. Two Paradigms of Negotiation Bargaining and Problem-Solving. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, November.
  • Hunter, J. 1998. Tuman River Area Development Program and Transboundary Water Pollution. http:// www.nautilus.org/papers/enviro/hunter_tumen.html1998
  • Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s Consequences. Sage.
  • Jabbour, E. 1993. Sulha: Palestinian Traditional Peacemaking Process. Montreal, House of Hope.
  • Klhon, W. and Andjelic, M. n.d. Lake Victoria: A Case in International Cooperation. http://www.fao.org/ag/AGL/AGLW/webpub/lakevic/LAKEVIC4.htm
  • Kramer, R. and Messick, D. 1991. Negotiation as a Social Process. Sage.
  • Kremenyuk, V. (ed.) 1991. International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues. Jossey- Bass.
  • Kressel, K. and Pruitt, D. 1989. Mediation Research; The Process and Effectiveness of Third- Party Intervention. Jossey-Bass.
  • Lax, D. and Sebenius, J. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator. New York, Free Press.
  • Lewicki, R. and Litterer, J. 1985. Negotiation. Illinois, Homewood.
  • Lipschuts, R. 1997. Damming Troubled Waters: Conflict over the Danube, 1950–2000. Conference on Environment and Security, October 1997. http://www.ciaonet.org
  • Maganck, R. 1999. Towards a Water Action Plan for the Americas. Third Inter-American Dialogue on Water Management, March.
  • Martin, G. 1988. The “Practical” and the “Theoretical” Split in Modern Negotiation Literature. Negotiation Journal, Vol. 4.
  • Maslow, A. 1968. Towards a Psychology of Being. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • Mautner-Markhof, F. 1989. Processes of International Negotiation. New York, Westview.
  • Menkel-Meadow, C. 1996. The Many Ways of Mediation: the Transformation, of Traditions, Ideaologies, Paradigms, and Practices. Journal of Negotiation, July.
  • Milich, L. and Varady, R. 1998. Openness, Sustainability, and Public Participation in Transboundary River-Basin Institutions. http;//ag.arizona.edu/OALS/ALN/aln44.1998
  • Moore, C. 1996. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflicts. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • Morgan, P. 1987. Resolving Conflict Through Win–win Negotiation. Management Solution.
  • Noronha, F. 1999. Agitation Flares Against India’s Naramada Dam. http://ens.lycos.com/ens.march99
  • Piwonka, M. 1998. Mediation in Water Law General Adjudications: Potential Remains Because of A Missed Opportunity. http//clubs.asua.arizona.edu/
  • Raiffa, H. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Belknap.
  • ––––. 1997. Lectures on Negotiation Analysis. Harvard University, PON.
  • Riskin, L. 1996. Understanding Mediators’ Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A grid for the Perplexed. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 7 (Spring).
  • Riskin, L. and Westbrook, J. 1987. Dispute Resolution and Lawyers. St Paul, Minn., West Publishing.
  • Ross, W. and LaCroix, J. 1996. Multiple Meaning of Trust in Negotiation Theory and Research: A Literature Review and Integrative Model. International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 314–51.
  • Rothman, J. 1993. Resolving Identity-Based Conflict. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • Rubin, J. 1981a. Psychological Traps. Psychology Today, March.
  • ––––. 1981b. Dynamics of Third Party Intervention. West Westport, Conn., Praeger.
  • Rubin, J. and Bert, B. 1975. The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. New York, Academic Press.
  • Rubin, J.; Pruitt, D.; and Hee Kim, S. 1986. Social Conflict. New York, McGraw-Hill.
  • Rubin, J. and Sander, F. 1991. Culture, Negotiation, and the Eye of the Beholder. Negotiation Journal, Vol. 7.
  • Schelling, T. 1980. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
  • Sebenius, J. 1984. Negotiating the Law of the Sea. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
  • Sherk, G.; Wouters, P.; and Rochford, S. 2000.Water Wars in the Near Future? Reconciling Competing Claims for the World Diminishing Fresh Water. http://www.dundee.ac.uk./journal/html
  • Silbey, S. and Merry, S. 1986. Mediator Settlement Strategies. Law and Policy, Vol. 8.
  • Susskind, L.; McKearnan, S.; and Toas-Larmer, J. 1994. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating more Effective Global Agreements. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.
  • ––––. 1999. The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreements. Corwin.
  • Susskind, L.; Moomaw, W.; and Hill, T. 1997. Innovation in International Environmental Negotiation. Harvard University, PON.
  • Thompson, L. and Nadler, J. 2000. Judgmental Biases in Conflict Resolution and How to Overcome Them. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • Touval, S. and Zartman, W. 1985. International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Boulder, Colo.,Westview.
  • Tversky, A. and Kahanman, D. 1995. Conflict Resolution: A Cognitive Perspective. In: A.
  • Tversky and R. Wilson, Barriers to Conflict Resolution. W. W. Norton.

Umbreit, M. 1997. Humanistic Mediation: A Transformative Journey to Peace Making. Mediation Quarterly, Vol. 14.

  • ––––. 1999. What Is Humanistic Mediation. http://ssw.che.umn.edu/rjp/resources/documents/cumb99aPDF
  • Ury, W.; Brett, J.; and Goldberg, S. 1993. Getting Dispute Resolved. Harvard University, PON.
  • Vinogradov, S. and Langford, V. 1998. Managing Transboundary Water Resources in the Aral Sea Basin: In Search of Solutions. Central Asian Customs Union Meets, March.
  • Watkins, M. and Rosegrant, S. 1996. Sources of Power in Coalition Building. Negotiation Journal, Vol. 12, No.1.
  • Wolf, A. 1998. Conflict and Cooperation Along International Waterways. Water Policy, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 251–65. www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/documents/conflict_coop/paper.html
  • ––––. 2001. Water, Conflict, and Cooperation. (2020 Focus 9; to be found on the web-site of Oregon University).
  • ––––. Indigenous Approaches to Water Conflict Negotiations and Implications for International Waters. www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/publications/indigenous/#paper

Data Base: www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/Projects/internationalDB.html The Danube : http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/projects/casestudies/danube.html The Indus: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/projects/casestudies/indus.html The Mekong: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/projects/casestudies/mekong.html The Nile http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/projects/casestudies/nile_agreement.html The La Plata: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/projects/casestudies/laplata.html The Ganges: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/projects/casestudies/ganges.html

  • Young, O. 1975. Bargaining: Formal Theories of Negotiation. Champaign, Ill., University of Illinois Press.
  • Zartman, W. 1994. International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
  • ––––. 1999. Justice in Negotiation. In: P. Berton, H. Kimura, and I. W. Zartman, International Negotiation: Actors, Structure/Process, Values. New York, St. Martin’s Press.
  • ––––. 1999. (ed.) Traditional Cures For Modern Conflicts. Boulder, Colo., Lynne Reinner.
  • Zartman, W. and Berman, M. 1982. The Practical Negotiator. Newhaven, Conn., Yale University Press.

See also

External Resources

Attachments

 Alternative Dispute Resolution Approaches and their Application.pdf

3979 Rating: 2.3/5 (33 votes cast)