Sharing the Incomati Waters: Cooperation and Competition in the Balance

From WaterWiki.net

Jump to: navigation, search
edit  ·  ToolkitWater Conflict and Cooperation
History of Humanity and Water | Shared Waters and Ethics | Legal and Institutional Approaches | Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
Emerging Trends | Public Participation | Indicators | Means and Tools | Basin Management | Lessons Learned
Organisations and Projects | Publications | Glossary | Bibliography
Case Studies: Incomati | Nile | Columbia | Lempa | Lake Titicaca | Mekong | Aral Sea | Rhine | Jordan I | Jordan II
Events | Contacts

Publication Title

Sharing the Incomati Waters: Cooperation and Competition in the Balance

Publication Type

UNESCO-IHP, PCCP Series Publication, 102 p.

Author(s)

Alavaro Carmo Vas and Pieter van der Zaag

Publication Date

2003

Publication URL

Contact

Contents


Description

This case study deals with the Incomati river basin, which is relatively small but has some interesting features, both in terms of socio-political developments and water use. The basin is situated in a part of Africa that over the last forty years has experienced a dynamic, sometimes turbulent and volatile, political history. Water use is intense, with at least 50 percent of the water generated in the basin being withdrawn, in a context of recurring droughts sometimes alternated by dramatic floods. These factors might have led to confrontations over water between the three countries sharing the basin, namely Mozambique, South Africa and Swaziland, yet these did not materialise. The central question raised is: why did cooperation prevail? To answer it, the case study presents information about the natural characteristics of the basin, its political history, water developments, the legal framework, and the negotiations that took place during the period 1964–2002.

It is concluded that cooperation prevailed, first, because there is an apparent pressure on neighbouring countries to behave as good neighbours, even when political ideologies diverge. This is possibly linked to the fact that such countries comprise people who share a common space and a common history. Furthermore, there are outside pressures on nation-states to act responsibly, and to honour regional and international conventions. A second cause relates to the particular political developments in both Mozambique and South Africa. Just when the need for an agreement was highest, the cold relations between the two countries started to thaw, allowing an important agreement to be reached in 1991. Third, there was a third riparian country whose role as broker was accepted by the other two due to its particular political and hydrological position vis-à-vis them.

Finally, potential conflicts were evaded by allowing more water to be abstracted and more dams to be built. The negotiations so far can therefore be considered non-zero sum games. However, as the Incomati basin fast approaches closure this situation is bound to change. Water sharing will increasingly be a delicate balancing act between cooperation and competition. The hypothesis that water drives peoples and countries towards cooperation is supported by the developments in the Incomati basin. Increased water use has indeed led to rising cooperation. When the next drought comes and Mozambique, South Africa, and Swaziland enforce the new agreement of 2002 and voluntarily decrease those water uses deemed less essential, then the hypothesis will have to be accepted.

References

  • Beinart, W. 1994. Twentieth-century South Africa. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • Bienen, H. S. 1985. Economic interests and security issues in Southern Africa. In: R. I. Rotberg, H. S. Bienen, R. Legrold, South Africa and its Neighbors: Regional Security and Self-Interest. Lexington, Mass., Toronto.
  • Brito, R. 2002. Brochure on Integrated Water Resources Management. Harare, Global Water Partnership: Southern Africa.
  • Cabaço, J. L. 1991. A Africa Austral e as transformações na Europa. In: A. Zacarias (ed.), Repensando estratégias sobre Moçambique e Africa Austral. Maputo
  • Carmo Vaz, A. and Lopes Pereira, A. 2000. The Incomati and Limpopo International River Basins, a View from Downstream. Water Policy. Vol. 2, Nos 1–2, pp. 99–112.
  • Cawthra, G. 1996. Brutal Force: The Apartheid war Machine. London.
  • Cliffe, L. 1976. Modelo de Colaboração e Conflito com o Subimperialismo Sulafricano. In: A Africa Austral em perspectiva. Lisbon, Centro de Estudos de Dependência, Vol. 1, pp. 113– 36.
  • Coker, C. 1985. South Africa: A new military role in Southern Africa 1969–82. In: R. Jaster, Southern Africa: Regional Security Problems and Prospects. Aldershot.
  • Coles, J. and Cohen, R. 1977. O Subimperialismo Sul-Africano. In: E. de Sousa Ferreira (ed.), A Africa do Sul e as Ex-Colonias Portuguesas. Lisbon.
  • Davies, R. and O’Meara, D. 1985. Total Strategy in Southern Africa: An Analysis of South African Regional Policy Since 1978. Journal of Southern African Studies. Vol. 11, No. 2, pp 183–211.
  • DNA. 1989. Review of the Water Resources of Maputo Province. World Bank Study. Arnhem, Euroconsult; Maputo, DNA.
  • Gomes, F. and Famba, S. I. 1999. Water Resources for Crop Production: Mozambique Country Report. Paper presented at the workshop on Integrated Analysis and Management of Renewable Natural Resources in Mozambique, Maputo, June 7–11.
  • Green, R. and Thompson, C. B. 1986. Political Economies in Conflict: SADCC, South Africa and sanctions. In: P. Johnson and D. Martin (eds.), Destructive Engagement: Southern Africa at War. Harare.
  • Hanlon, J. 1984. Mozambique: the Revolution Under Fire. London, Zed.
  • ––––. 1986. Beggar your neighbors: Apartheid Power in Southern Africa. London, Bloomington, Ind.
  • Jewitt, G. P. W.; Heritage, G. L.; Mackenzie, J. A.; and Weeks, D. C. n.d. The Sabie River Catchment. URL: http://www.ccwr.ac.za/knprrp/blink/chapter2.htm.
  • JIBS. 2001. Joint Inkomati Basin Study Phase 2. Consultec in association with BKS Acres. Final Draft, April 2001.
  • Katzenellenbogen, S. E. 1982. South Africa and Southern Mozambique: Labor, Railways, and Trade in the Making of a Relationship. Manchester.
  • Libby, R. T. 1987. The Politics of Economic Power in Southern Africa. New Jersey.
  • Minter, W. 1977. Origens Externas da Reacção em Angola e Moçambique. In: E. de Sousa Ferreira (ed.), A Africa do Sul e as Ex-Colónias Portuguesas. Lisbon.
  • ––––. 1998. Os Contras do Apartheid; As Raízes da Guerra em Angola e Moçambique. Maputo.
  • Murteira, M. 2000. Formação e Colapso de uma Economia Colonial. In: F. Bethencourt and K. Chaudhuri (eds), História da Expansão Portuguesa: Vol. 5: Último Império e Recentramento (1930–98). Lisbon.
  • Mwendera, E. J.; Manyatsi, A. M.; Magwenzi, O.; and Dhlamini, S. M. 2002. Swaziland Water Demand Management Country Study Report. Water Demand Management Program for Southern Africa Phase II. Pretoria, IUCN.
  • Newitt, M. 1995. A History of Mozambique. Johannesburg, Witwatersrand University Press.
  • Nyathi, W. M. 1977. O Imperialismo Sul-Africano na Africa Austral. In: E. de Sousa Ferreira (ed.), A Africa do Sul e as Ex-Colónias Portuguesas. Lisbon.
  • Ohlsson, L. 1995. Water and Security in Southern Africa. Publications on Water Resources No. 1. Stockholm, Sida.
  • Packard, R. 2001. “Malaria Blocks Development” Revisited: the Role of Disease in the History of Agricultural Development in the Eastern and Northern Transvaal Lowveld, 1890–1960. Journal of Southern African Studies. Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 591–612.
  • Price, R. M. 1990. Pretoria’s Southern African strategy. In: S. Chan (ed.), Exporting Apartheid: Foreign Policies in Southern Africa 1978–88. London and Basingstoke.
  • SADC. 1995. Protocol on Shared Watercourse Systems in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Signed in Johannesburg on August 28 1995. Gaborone, SADC.
  • ––––. 2000. Protocol on Shared Watercourses in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Region. Signed in Windhoek on August 7 2000. Gaborone, SADC.
  • SASA. 2002. South African Sugar Industry Directory. Mount Edgecombe, South African Sugar Association (URL: http://www.sugar.org.za).
  • Schouwenaars, J. M. 1988. Rainfall Irregularity and Sowing Strategies in Southern Mozambique. Agricultural Water Management, Vol 13, pp. 49–64.
  • Smithers, J. C.; Schulze, R. E.; Pike, A.; and Jewitt, G. P. W. 2001. A Hydrological Perspective of the February 2000 Floods: A Case Study in the Sabie River Catchment. Water SA, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 325–32.
  • TIA. 2002. Tripartite Interim Agreement between Mozambique, South Africa and Swaziland for cooperation on the protection and sustainable utilization of the water resources of the Incomati and Maputo watercourses. Johannesburg, August 29 2002.
  • UN. 1997. Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. Adopted by the United Nationals General Assembly in resolution 51/229 of May 21 1997. New York, United Nations.
  • Van Niekerk, P. H. 1989. Basin Studies for Participative Water Resource Planning. The Civil Engineer in South Africa, October [in Afrikaans].
  • Van Der Zaag, P. 1984. Desenho de 1600 Hectares de Arroz Alagado. Projecto de recuperação de regadios de Macia. Brigada de Construção de Macia. SRBL, Xai Xai.
  • Waalewijn, P. 2002. Squeezing the Cow: Perceptions and Strategies of Stakeholders Concerning River Basin Management on the Lower Komati River, South Africa. M.Sc. Thesis, Wageningen, Wageningen University.
  • Wuyts, M. 1989. Money and Planning for Socialist Transition: The Mozambican Experience. Aldershot, UK, Gower.
  • Zacarias, A. 1991. Repensando Estratégias Sobre Moçambique e Africa Austral. Maputo.

See also

External Resources

Attachments

 PCCP Incomati case study.pdf

8803 Rating: 2.2/5 (54 votes cast)