Water Knowledge Fair 2006

From WaterWiki.net

Jump to: navigation, search
edit  ·  Case StudiesWater Knowledge Fair 2006
Browse other video exhibits from Cyprus | Egypt | Jordan | Lithuania | Morocco | Romania | Somalia | Tajikistan | Crimea | Uzbekistan
Other Exhibits from:

Albania | Armenia | Belarus | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Caspian Sea Basin | Danube River Basin | Dnipro Basin | Kazakhstan (1) | Kazakhstan (2) | Kyrgyzstan/Kazakhstan | Macedonia/Prespa Lake | Montenegro/Lake Skadr | Peipsi/Chudskoe Basin | Romania (1) | Romania (2) | Turkey (1) | Turkey (2) | Turkey (3)

Other Case Studies:

Cap-Net/UNDP | Enhancing Access to Information and Public Participation in Environmental Decision-making | ‘Value Base Assessment procedure’ and the use of Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) in relation to transboundary water management | TEST - Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technology in the Danube River Basin | IW:LEARN: Facilitating Knowledge Sharing Among GEF International Waters Project Portfolio and their Partners | GloBallast - Invasion of the Killer Species

Related resources:

Summaries of Forum I: Status of IWRM in Europe, CIS and the Arab States / Forum II: From the HDR 2006 to Action on the Ground / Forum III: Stakeholder Management in Water Projects | Lessons from the Virtual Knowledge Fair as KM-event (behind the scenes) |

Welcome to the workspace of the Virtual Knowledge Fair on Water, 15-17 November 2006!

Below you will find a list of all submissions and other useful information. Please note: This event is closed now and therefore no more submissions can be accepted.

You are nevertheless very much encouraged though to share your experiences: Just add a new article at the proper place (e.g. under the "experience" chapter of your country-page) by using the "experience template" - see the tutorial to learn how.
Videos
See more on the YouTube WaterWiki-channel

Contents

About the Water Knowledge Fair

The knowledge fair, through interactive exhibits and virtual meeting places, encourages participants from the Arab States, Eastern Europe and Central Asia to share their experiences and solutions in water governance with UN-Water and development experts, as well as with external specialists, researchers, NGOs, partners and other actors in the field.

The fair seeks to:

  • Provide a forum for the water community to "meet" and discuss some of the many vital issues in water governance;
  • Present and learn from experiences within and across regions on water issues;
  • Showcase UNDP's portfolio and work with its partners in the area of water governance; and
  • Discuss specific issues and challenges highlighted in the Human Development Report 2006, exploring and demonstrating its relevance for Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, Northern Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia.


Why This Fair?

Water resources represent a critical ingredient of human and economic development in Europe and CIS as well as in the Arab States region. They are furthermore the basis for important water-based ecosystems, many of which contain globally significant biodiversity and are suffering from serious degradation or are under threat from pollution, habitat degradation, over-exploitation, and other forms of human pressure. Achieving a balance between the demands of human societies for water and the needs of the aquatic ecosystems on which those societies ultimately depend remains a key challenge.

The long history of UNDP interventions in the area of water governance reform in both regions represents a significant pool of knowledge, experience and good practice examples. Based on this experience and UNDP's network of practitioners and experts, the Bratislava Regional Centre and the Sub-Regional Resource Facility for Arab States provide support and advice to Country Offices and external partners for capacity development and replication and upscaling of proven interventions and approaches to effective water governance.

Information and knowledge is also being codified through the contributions of UNDP water practitioners within regional Water Governance Communities of Practice, such as this very WaterWiki. A website was also created to display the information (closed after 3 years) as follows:

List of all contributions for exhibition at the Virtual Knowledge Fair 2006

Single-country exhibits

Albania - Introducing Solar-Powered Water Heating

Armenia - New Water Code, National Water Policy and National Water Program

Belarus - Management plans for key biodiversity areas

Bosnia and Herzegovina - Water for Srebrenica Project

Cyprus - Management and Assessment of the Ecology of Cyprus’ Artificial Wetlands (MACAW)

Egypt - Building an artificial wetland to treat wastewater

Jordan - Wastewater recycling

Kazakhstan - NGO Zhalgas-Counterpart - Civil Society Support Centre in Almaty

Kazakhstan - National Integrated Water Resources Management and Water Efficiency Plan

Kyrgyzstan/Kazakhstan - Formation of a Chu-Talas Rivers Commission

Lithuania - Sustainable Development of the Nemunas Delta Supported by the Community of Minge Village

Macedonia - Integrated Water Resources Management in the Prespa region through participatory processes and dialogue

Morocco - Creating artificial rain and watershed basin agencies

Romania - Partnership with Coca-Cola in Water Management

Romania - Rehabilitation of the Water Supply/Sewerage Public Service in Medgidia

Romania - Sustainable Management of the “Tur River” Natural Reserve

Somalia - Water Management amid recurrent drought

Tajikistan - Mobilization of labor remittances into infrastructure rehabilitation

Turkey - Sustainable Fishing and Consumption of Pearl Mullet

Turkey - Environmentally, Socially and Economically Sustainable Salt Extraction in Palas lake

Turkey - Promotion of Drip Irrigation in Sugar Beet Production

Ukraine - Lessons from Community Based Approaches in Water Supply Projects for Multi-ethnic Neighbourhoods in Crimea

Uzbekistan - Celebrating Communities


Multi-country cases

Preparation of a Strategic Action Program for the Dnipro River Basin and Development of SAP Implementation Mechanism

Workshop on the Lake Skadar International Designation for Territorial Development

Communication and Public Participation Case Study for the Caspian Sea

Cap-Net/UNDP

Enhancing Access to Information and Public Participation in Environmental Decision-making

‘Value Base Assessment procedure’ and the use of Multi Criteria Analysis (MCA) in relation to transboundary water management

UNDP/GEF Danube Regional Project

TEST - Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technology in the Danube River Basin

Lessons from the Lake Peipsi/Chudskoe Basin Management Program

IW:LEARN: Facilitating Knowledge Sharing Among GEF International Waters Project Portfolio and their Partners

GloBallast - Invasion of the Killer Species


Withdrawn/cancelled contributions

Transboundary Waters Experience - Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia (TWME-ECCA (WITHDRAWN FROM EXHIBITION Juerg.staudenmann 14:25, 29 Aug 2006 (CEST))

Uzbekistan - Support to Water Users Associations (WITHDRAWN FROM EXHIBITION Juerg.staudenmann 14:31, 29 Aug 2006 (CEST))

Kyrgyzstan - Kyrgyz contribution to the TWME-ECCA project (WITHDRAWN FROM EXHIBITION, Juerg.staudenmann 19:52, 6 Sep 2006 (CEST))

Kyrgyzstan - Support to Integrated Water Resources Management Planning in Central Asia (WITHDRAWN FROM EXHIBITION, Juerg.staudenmann 19:52, 6 Sep 2006 (CEST))

Armenia - Reforms in Water Supply and Sanitation Sector (WITHDRAWN FROM EXHIBITION, Juerg.staudenmann 16:23, 7 Sep 2006 (CEST))

Armenia - Water Quality and Quantity Monitoring, Regional Data Exchange (WITHDRAWN FROM EXHIBITION, Juerg.staudenmann 16:23, 7 Sep 2006 (CEST))

Stakeholder and NGO Mobilization in the Kura-Aras River Basin (Not ready for public display, Juerg.staudenmann 12:09, 22 Sep 2006 (CEST))


Summary of Live Forum Discussions

  1. Summary of Live Forum I: IWRM in Eastern Europe, the CIS and the Arab States
  2. Summary of Live Forum II: The Human Development Report (HDR) 2006 - From the Report to Action on the Ground
  3. Summary of Live Forum III: Stakeholder Management in Water Projects


Lessons Learned (Excerpt of the Final Report on Water Knowledge Fair 2006)

(Excerpt of the Final Report on Water Knowledge Fair 2006)


Idea and the business case

  • It’s important to develop a clear and convincing business case in the first place shortly following the project mandate and before starting any brainstorming or activities towards the content or design of a knowledge fair!

Sequencing/timing

  • A proper sequencing of project steps with a clear time plan including tolerances for adjustments is essential for such a project – especially given the degree of novelty / innovation.

Responsibilities

  • When project management of such innovative undertakings is kept in-house, there should be at least two persons fully dedicated to the event who will ensure the project management and the project support sides.
  • A task force should be established (at a later stage of the process) with clear responsibilities assigned to each individual task manager,
  • It should be considered to assign (or hire esternally) one person as full-time project manager .

Outsourcing and procurement

  • Sufficient time needs to be allocated for planning and clear definition of requirements and tasks in the TOR for sub-contractors.
  • In terms of UNDP procurement procedures – Request for Proposals (RFP) is a better choice than Request for Quotations (RFQ); particularly for the creative parts (web-design/solution). The latter relies on the offered price as the only criterion for selection (lowest price winner) whereas the former requires a set of quality criteria to be elaborated prior to the launch of the bid. Consequently, applicants should prepare much longer and more sophisticated proposals as well as technical documentations (foresee enough time for that too!).

Website Development

  • Design of the web-platform is of utmost importance. It should be luring, interesting and surprising. Web-fairs are one-time event with limited duration. Therefore they should be very interactive, teasing while also easy to access and use (e.g. real chat, live presentations/panel discussions, video streams, possibility to see who else is in the "room", etc.).
  • It is desirable for the software to be reusable for other online events;

(iii) Connectivity issues are important, should be thought of and appropriately resolved before the launch of the event. Web content should be adapted to the low speed of access in many countries in order to reduce the risk of losing customers and visitors;

  • Server's ability to work efficiently under heavy load was not sufficient, especially for country in the Arab States region. In the future, it will be worth using the worldwide content caching facility as in use for HDR.
  • Two-phased approach: It’s important to time the development of the site (and include this in the TOR and budget of the sub-contract of the web-developer) in such a manner as to have ample time for proper testing, and the flexibility to adjust or even re-do parts of the site BEFORE the content is uploaded/entered.

Information flow, reporting and monitoring

  • Create a mailing list and always include all members when exchanging information
  • when sub-groups or bilateral communication is more adequate (to solve or decide on a sub-task), mail out regular summaries or updates to the entire mailing-list
  • Document and distribute decisions, and observe & monitor deadlines for doing so

Cross-regional collaboration

  • when more than one office (physical location) are involved, it’s probably advisable to assign overall coordination responsibility to one of them
  • properly plan task and work load distribution
  • exchange information in a regular and regulated manner (see also above)

CO involvement

  • In principle, most CO colleagues are willing to contribute to such endeavors; but most of them will need significant moral support and motivation to deliver their share. Regular reminders (also calling them up besides e-mailing) seem necessary
  • It seems beneficial from a moral point of view to involve CO colleagues from the beginning, and to arrange the contributing in such a manner as for all to see the progrees of the others (“peer-pressure”)

CoP mobilization & media

  • Don’t take for granted participation of in-house colleagues and thus don’t focus all mobilization effort to external audiences/participants.
  • using existing tools (WaterWiki) fro CoP-members to contribute their cases / write-ups can have a welcomed side-effect of (a) awareness building regarding available KM tools (walking through / “forcing” to use it) and (b) technical capacity buildingh in it’s use (“learning by doing”)
  • besides all technical and content aspects, don’t forget to liaise with CO communication officers early on

Conclusions and Recommendations for similar web-based knowledge fairs in the future

(Excerpt of the Final Report on Water Knowledge Fair 2006)

Organizing UNDP’s Water Knowledge Fair as the organization’s first virtual fair ever was a demanding task but the well-organized team of staffers from Bratislava and Beirut have managed to tackle all the obstacles and hurdles with the final product being a fair that has moved the boundaries and has set new standards tracing a path for future organization of similar events on other topics. The fair has promoted the most innovative community of practice activities in the UNDP. The fair has broadened the horizons, enabled the exchange of experiences and ideas and showcased some of the innovative approaches to water governance in both regions. It was a great opportunity to, at low cost and easy participation via the internet, highlight achievement and gain exposure and recognition of UNDP’s best practices, especially as it coincided with the launch of 2006 Global UNDP Development Report dedicated to water. The fair has positioned UNDP as a credible partner in water governance and has provided an opportunity to codify the good practices and lessons in water governance and capture them in a lasting and efficient way through the water fair web site and/or connecting it to WaterWiki. Web-based fairs seem appropriate tools for various purposes – from community mobilization through raising awareness to the creation of something that stays and serves the practitioners in the long run. However, its impact could even be strengthened if the framework is chosen somewhat different. Possible ways to improve the impact of the fair:

  • The more interactive the website, the higher the chance that it attracts more visitors and/or keeps their interest at higher levels and thus motivates them to visit more “exhibitions”, participate in more on-line activities (quiz, discussions, chats and submitting comments, contribute to ‘games’, etc.); the potential risks are (a) that more bandwidth is needed (discriminating low-connectivity participates) and (b) loss of overview or easiness to navigate on the site.
  • The duration of the “life” discussions and of the fair altogether must be long enough; the feedback indicated that participants would have whished at least one or two days to get familiar with the website and discussion topics, before feeling “fit” to actively contribute to the discussions themselves. A duration of one week rather than 3 days seems appropriate.
  • An on-line fair could be used as departure point for a regional background paper / study, collecting knowledge and contributions from a wide range of practitioners, as well as concrete data and figures;
  • It appears that tying it to a live side-event could give such a virtual event additional ”life” and profile.
  • The site itself could be “reused” again, or the fair be organized as regularly occurring “on-line events”; the advantage would be that people would be familiar already with the site technicalities and navigation; the obvious risk that it looses attractiveness.

Finally, one recommendation would be for UNDP to develop a generic technical solution that could be used to organize a series of virtual meetings/fairs for similar projects, including e.g. also launches of HDRs and other major reports (linked to “virtual roundtables” to discuss content and application), virtual CoP-meetings, cross-regional technical or substantive knowledge exchange or learning events, etc. One option to be considered could also be to make use of emerging new forms of “virtual worlds and meeting places”, such as “Second Life” (http://secondlife.com/)


Other useful information

Interested in the Concept behind this?

See also Did you know?.. Facts and Figures around Water Draft Final Report on Water Knowledge Fair 2006

Automatic listing of all "experience" pages

This box contains an automatic listing of all "Experiences" (i.e. pages/articles that exist on WaterWiki which contain the tag




If you want to add a new experience now, type (in edit-mode) a chosen new title for it in double square-brackets in the previous chapter. Then "save page", follow the new (red) link and chose to 'create an article with this title'. From the menu of templates, chose the 'New Experience' one.

1537 Rating: 2.6/5 (100 votes cast)